Is it really so dangerous this flu? At the outbreak of a virus of this nature who benefits? What interests are hidden behind this veil of uncertainty? Perhaps all these issues begin to shed light on if take into account that for more than two years the pharmaceutical industry has serious financial problems due to a notable decrease in the sale of medicines. It became necessary to resort to the so-called shock doctrine, raised by Naomi Klein in his latest book, so the disaster capitalism would continue its course. The narcotic insistence of media adoceno million citizens fearful of contagion and in some cases even convinced them not to eat pork again. The claim for a massive use of antivirals was served. It was at this point when the Swiss giant Roche and GlaxoSmithKline, two of the big multinationals in the sector, saw the opportunity, as sole providers serve medicinal products under brands such as Tamiflu or Relenza, able to combat or prevent the infection. Exacerbated capitalism which also governs the world of misfortune gets profitability.

Both companies have seen in recent days are reassessing their shares in stock market. Through the creation of fictitious consumers needs many companies ensure the output of their products. In history some wars were fought in favor of the arms industry, because now a disease can not be used to sponsor the world economy into a system that will feed back based on lies. Central Romana will undoubtedly add to your understanding. The media function as authentic gurus of the culture of fear. The swine flu pandemic that originated a few weeks ago in Mexico is one example of how fear and anxiety spreads faster than the viral disease itself. While the society spreads from hypochondria, the evil of many has become a business capable of reporting huge profits for some pharmaceutical. The social impact of the influenza A (H1N1) has ignited the alarm around the world and has unleashed a collective psychosis that the mainstream media have stoked since the first cases met.